About the Waste Hub

 

The CCAC’s seven Hubs address agriculture, cooling, fossil fuel, heavy-duty vehicles, household energy, waste, and national planning. Through these Hubs, the CCAC aims to advance action on SLCPs mitigation in key sectors. For more information about the Hubs, visit the About the Hubs page.

The Waste Hub brings together governments, inter-governmental and non-governmental organizations along with private sector leaders to share expertise and support countries in mitigating SLCPs from organic waste and opening burning of waste. The Waste Hub works closely with the National Planning Hub and the Agriculture Hub to identify synergies and further opportunities for collaboration.

Reducing SLCP emissions from waste

Municipal solid waste is the third largest source of human-caused methane emissions globally due to dumped and landfilled organic waste. In developing countries, over 50% of municipal solid waste is organic waste that could be diverted from the landfill for other uses, like fertilizer. About 5 percent of global anthropogenic black carbon emissions are attributed to the waste sector from open burning of waste in opendumps and landfills and at individual households. The CCAC focuses on improving organic waste management and banning open burning to reduce methane and black carbon emissions.

Top facts

Up to 589 tonnes of CO2 equivalent emissions could be avoided by 2030 with full implementation of current landfill gas capture technology - an estimated 61% of sector emissions.
Up to 589 tonnes of CO2 equivalent emissions could be avoided by 2030 with full implementation of current landfill gas capture technology - an estimated 61% of sector emissions.
Globally, an estimated 40% of waste is openly burned, releasing harmful dioxins, furans, and black carbon into the atmosphere.
Globally, an estimated 40% of waste is openly burned, releasing harmful dioxins, furans, and black carbon into the atmosphere.
Globally, about one-third of food produced for human consumption is lost or wasted, amounting to about 1.3 billion tonnes every year.
Globally, about one-third of food produced for human consumption is lost or wasted, amounting to about 1.3 billion tonnes every year.

Factsheets

Leadership

The Waste Hub is co-led by Chile, Germany, and the United States. Co-leadership by countries ensures government engagement and ownership of the solutions. Co-leads provide valuable insights into the policy process to help ensure implementation is practical from a national perspective.

The Waste Leadership Group consists of both state and non-state members that provide guidance and expertise, and connect the Hub to activities underway beyond the CCAC.

  • States: Canada, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Japan, Mexico, Nigeria, Sweden, Uganda

  • Non-states: ABRELPE, Abt Associates, Afvalzorg, C40, CCAP, CEGESTI, CATF, CHRE, Engineering X, GAIA, Global Methane Hub, IGES, IGSD, ISWA, Institute of Environmental Biotechnology-Boku, National University of Laos, People in Need, RMI, Serbian Solid Waste Association, SEI, UNEP, UN-Habitat, World Biogas Association, WMO

Goals

By 2030, all CCAC countries have reduced methane from the waste sector to a level consistent with a 1.5°C pathway, and have reflected this goal in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and other planning and strategy documents, and all CCAC countries aim to prevent and eliminate the open burning of waste, at all scales – households to city-wide.

Action to achieve these goals:

  • ​Engage with CCAC national government partners to support waste-related SLCP mitigation measures and actions in their sub-national governments and municipalities, ensure that waste sector emissions are reflected in inventories, and that the sector is appropriately captured in NDCs. 
  • Engage cities and local governments in a planning and policy capacity, based on science-based and data-driven approach, that will focus on:
    • Prevention and reduction of organic waste generation; increased diversion of organic waste from landfills;

    • Enhanced organic waste recovery or utilization including commercial food waste and other organics;

    • Elimination of open burning of waste;

    • Logistics planning (organic waste separation/collection), including private-public partnerships;

    • Facilities and land use planning;

    • Financial planning, including training for local government officials, including accessing climate or development financing, local fees, government support, private sector investment.

Activities

Location of activities

  • Africa
    • Benin
    • Eswatini
    • Ethiopia
      • Addis Ababa
    • Ghana
      • Accra
    • Ivory Coast
      • Abidjan
    • Jordan
      • Amman
    • Kenya
      • Nairobi
    • Morocco
      • Rabat
    • Sierra Leone
      • City of Freetown
    • South Africa
      • eThekwini
    • Tanzania
      • Dar es Salaam
    • Togo
      • Lome
    • Uganda
  • Asia and the Pacific
    • Cambodia
      • Battambang
    • India
      • Delhi
    • Indonesia
    • Jordan
      • Amman
    • Maldives
      • Male
    • Philippines
      • Cebu
  • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • Argentina
      • Buenos Aires
    • Brazil
      • Sao Paulo
    • Colombia
      • Cali
    • Costa Rica
    • Guatemala
      • Guatemala City
    • Peru
      • Arequipa
      • Lima
  • West Asia
    • Lebanon
      • Tyre

Description of activities

Workstream | Waste
Ongoing
All communities, from large megacities to smaller towns and villages, generate waste. In almost all cases, communities are the primary decision makers when it comes to local waste management. They...
Workstream | Waste
Ongoing
The Waste Initiative strives to effect meaningful improvement on a specific aspect of solid waste management – reduction of short-lived climate pollutant (SLCP) emissions, including methane and black...
Workstream | Waste
Ongoing
Improper waste management is an environmental and social challenge that affects millions of people worldwide, and continues to grow in scale with rising urban populations and incomes. Taking action...
Waste collection in Dandora, Kenya
Workstream | Waste
Ongoing
In communities with inadequate waste management systems, waste might be deliberately burned to free up space at dumpsites, to facilitate scavenging of non-combustible materials (such as metals) for...
Open waste burning
Workstream | Waste
Ongoing
While reducing and diverting waste addresses many landfill challenges, these practices do not prevent landfills from generating methane , a greenhouse gas 21 times more powerful than carbon dioxide (...
Landfill methane gas capture
Workstream | Waste
Ongoing
Approximately one-third of all food produced for human consumption is lost or wasted. In cities, food often makes up the majority of waste that ends up in landfills, where it gradually decomposes and...
Food waste

Achievements to date

Our activities in the solid waste sector support commitments made by Coalition ministers to encourage actions by national, state, and local governments to avoid and reduce methane emissions from organic waste, prevent the open burning of waste, and work towards achieving universal waste collection by 2025. Our key achievements to date include: 
 

  • 3,268 person days of training on practices to reduce SLCP emissions from the waste sector 
  • Seven countries supported to develop national and local solid waste regulations and strategies to reduce SLCP emissions, including Chile, Eswatini, Guatemala, Kenya, and Peru.
  • Sustainable waste management laws were adopted in Cebu, Philippines and Sao Paulo, Brazil and Kenya. One law was developed in Battambang, Cambodia
  • Waste methane emissions targeted in 36 CCAC partners’ NDCs  

  • Developed 27 knowledge resources and tools that enable cities to assess current practices and identify suitable solutions, including the City Assessment ToolOrganEcs - Cost Estimating Tool for Managing Source-Separated Organic WasteSolid Waste Emissions Estimation Tool (SWEET)Landfill Gas Project Screening Tool, and financing assessment tools 
  • 119 cities actively participate in a global network and are committed to reduce short-lived climate pollutants from the waste sector 
  • 108 action plans for cities to reduce short-lived climate pollutants from the waste sector  
  • 37 cities have workplans to move forward actions that will reduce emissions from the waste sector. We have helped several cities implement activities in their workplan, including implementation of new composting plants in the State of Penang, Malaysia and the city of São Paulo, Brazil, and the closure of a dumpsite in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.  
  • Conducted project pre-feasibility studies for organic treatment projects in four cities – São PauloViña del MarQuito, and Arequipa. This included: an Ecopark for São Paulo, an anaerobic digestion plant for Viña, and composting facilities, for Quito and Arequipa. 
  • 85 municipalities supported through seven regional networks: South America and Mexico, Central America, India, Francophone Africa, South East Europe/Middle East/Central Asia, South East Asia, and Sub-Sahara and East Africa. 
  • Conducted 24 political outreach events on short-lived climate pollutant mitigation measures in the waste sector. 
  • A Waste Finance Programme was developed to help cities access financing by connecting them with the right financial institutions and technical experts to build emission-reducing waste projects. Throughout 2019 and 2020, 34 cities participated in finance-specific interactions, including webinars and discussion groups between cities. Four cities received targeted technical assistance to overcome financial barriers to develop and fund waste projects.  

Contacts

Sandra Mazo-Nix,
Programme Manager
secretariat [at] ccacoalition.org

Pollutants addressed

Partners & Actors

Lead Partner: A Coalition partner with an active role in coordinating, monitoring and guiding the work of an initiative.

Implementer: A Coalition partner or actor receiving Coalition funds to implement an activity or initiative.

Partners (22)

FAQ

What is the significance of SLCPs in the waste sector?

Globally, landfills are the third largest anthropogenic source of methane, accounting for approximately 11% of estimated global methane emissions, or nearly 800 MtCO2e.  Uncollected waste can contribute to open burning and illegal landfilling or open dumping, contributors to methane and black carbon. 

The World Bank projects that municipal solid waste streams will nearly double worldwide by 2025, which not only places increasing pressure on cities to provide proper collection and management services in order to avoid open dumping and open burning, but also significantly increases the load on the environment in terms of air pollutants like methane and black carbon within a business-as-usual scenario.

What are benefits from improving waste management?

More efficient collection of waste and sanitary landfills as opposed to open dumping helps keep cities cleaner and thus improves surrounding ecosystem health.

Improvement of waste management systems is one of the best ways for cities to enhance real estate values and overall local value and quality of life. While waste management will always ultimately incur economic costs for a city, as a public service that needs to be provided, appropriate waste management strategies can reduce costs from environmental damage and help improve a city’s marketability. Proper waste management can create significant job opportunities as well. A recent study published by the European Commission shows that full implementation of EU waste legislation would save €72 billion a year, increase the annual turnover of the EU waste management and recycling sector by €42 billion and create over 400,000 jobs by 2020.

Waste can also be a resource.  For some cities, generating energy from waste either through landfill gas capture or incineration as a part of an integrated solid waste management plan has the potential to help offset fossil fuel derived energy sources and therefore improve resource efficiency. Additionally, compost produced from organic waste can be used as a soil amendment displacing synthetic fertilizers comprised of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. 

What about food waste?

Food waste is addressed through one of the elements of an integrated solid waste management system through the diversion of organics. Organics management is a challenge to both developed and developing cities like New York City and Penang (Malaysia). A range of technologies exists to avoid emissions of methane from decomposition of organic waste in landfills and dumps, from processing organic waste simple windrow composting to anaerobic digestion technology. Food waste can also be addressed through prevention, for example awareness raising, and outreach and incentive programs. The Initiative will continue to feature cities like New York and Penang who have specific expertise to share with the network in order to scale up successes across the globe.

Furthermore, the Initiative has identified that a key challenge to the sustainability of organics programs that is not commonly addressed by the industry is how to create a market for the generated compost or other products.  That is why the World Bank is designing a results-based incentive mechanism to increase the diversion of organic waste in Penang and is developing a learning tool to help cities from both developed or developing countries on creating sustainable markets for composting to ensure the success of their food waste and organics programs.

What is the hoped-for magnitude of SLCP reductions achievable through the work of the initiative?

In the waste sector, it is important to note that reductions are guaranteed as you move up the waste hierarchy, from open dumping to waste avoidance. However, because the widely varying situations in the world – for example waste composition, climate, economic and social consequences, there is no standardized approach to easily calculate the magnitude of SLCP reduction via waste management efforts.  

Although estimates can be made based on proxies, they will not be realistic or verifiable.  The initiative has begun work to build a calculator to be able to quantify baseline emissions and projected emissions reductions with standardized methodology. We expect the tool to be functional by October. 

Again, rapid action to reduce black carbon and methane can be achieved through banning open burning, optimizing transportation routes and upgrading equipment, diverting organics etc. However these activities cannot be implemented alone as there are considerations for economic and social challenges. That is why the initiative supports the development of tailored integrated solid waste management at the local and national levels. The initiative stresses that there are no one-size-fits-all solutions.

In the waste sector, it is important to note that reductions are guaranteed as you move up the waste hierarchy, from open dumping to waste avoidance. However, because the widely varying situations in the world – for example waste composition, climate, economic and social consequences, there is no standardized approach to easily calculate the magnitude of SLCP reduction via waste management efforts.  

Although estimates can be made based on proxies, they will not be realistic or verifiable.  The initiative has begun work to build a calculator to be able to quantify baseline emissions and projected emissions reductions with standardized methodology. We expect the tool to be functional by October. 

Again, rapid action to reduce black carbon and methane can be achieved through banning open burning, optimizing transportation routes and upgrading equipment, diverting organics etc. However these activities cannot be implemented alone as there are considerations for economic and social challenges. That is why the initiative supports the development of tailored integrated solid waste management at the local and national levels. The initiative stresses that there are no one-size-fits-all solutions.

How will the initiative achieve these reductions?

Stratus Consulting conducted a short study on mitigation options for short-lived climate pollutants (SLCP) mitigation from the waste sector and identified that the greatest potential to reduce black carbon comes from the transportation of and open burning of waste. Open burning is a challenge in many developing cities due to lack of landfill space and lack of awareness. 

The Initiative’s work with cities will focus on moving up the waste hierarchy and developing integrated solid waste services, and one of the first steps is to gather data on open burning and identify options to mitigate this practice. Another important element in addressing black carbon is to challenge the transport system by optimizing collection routes and upgrading equipment. 

As a part of an integrated approach to waste management, once an assessment has been conducted (first stage of city support), the initiative will be able to report on how many cities will address open burning and transportation of waste as key sources of black carbon.

Resources

Back to Top