The CCAC’s seven Hubs address agriculture, cooling, fossil fuel, heavy-duty vehicles, household energy, waste, and national planning. Through these Hubs, the CCAC aims to advance action on SLCPs mitigation in key sectors. For more information about the Hubs, visit the About the Hubs page.
The Waste Hub brings together governments, inter-governmental and non-governmental organizations along with private sector leaders to share expertise and support countries in mitigating SLCPs from organic waste and opening burning of waste. The Waste Hub works closely with the National Planning Hub and the Agriculture Hub to identify synergies and further opportunities for collaboration.
Reducing SLCP emissions from waste
Municipal solid waste is the third largest source of human-caused methane emissions globally due to dumped and landfilled organic waste. In developing countries, over 50% of municipal solid waste is organic waste that could be diverted from the landfill for other uses, like fertilizer. About 5 percent of global anthropogenic black carbon emissions are attributed to the waste sector from open burning of waste in opendumps and landfills and at individual households. The CCAC focuses on improving organic waste management and banning open burning to reduce methane and black carbon emissions.
The Waste Hub is co-led by Chile, Germany, and the United States. Co-leadership by countries ensures government engagement and ownership of the solutions. Co-leads provide valuable insights into the policy process to help ensure implementation is practical from a national perspective.
The Waste Leadership Group consists of both state and non-state members that provide guidance and expertise, and connect the Hub to activities underway beyond the CCAC.
States: Canada, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Japan, Mexico, Nigeria, Sweden, Uganda
Non-states: ABRELPE, Abt Associates, Afvalzorg, C40, CCAP, CEGESTI, CATF, CHRE, Engineering X, GAIA, Global Methane Hub, IGES, IGSD, ISWA, Institute of Environmental Biotechnology-Boku, National University of Laos, People in Need, RMI, Serbian Solid Waste Association, SEI, UNEP, UN-Habitat, World Biogas Association, WMO
By 2030, all CCAC countries have reduced methane from the waste sector to a level consistent with a 1.5°C pathway, and have reflected this goal in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and other planning and strategy documents, and all CCAC countries aim to prevent and eliminate the open burning of waste, at all scales – households to city-wide.
Action to achieve these goals:
Prevention and reduction of organic waste generation; increased diversion of organic waste from landfills;
Enhanced organic waste recovery or utilization including commercial food waste and other organics;
Elimination of open burning of waste;
Logistics planning (organic waste separation/collection), including private-public partnerships;
Facilities and land use planning;
Financial planning, including training for local government officials, including accessing climate or development financing, local fees, government support, private sector investment.
Our activities in the solid waste sector support commitments made by Coalition ministers to encourage actions by national, state, and local governments to avoid and reduce methane emissions from organic waste, prevent the open burning of waste, and work towards achieving universal waste collection by 2025. Our key achievements to date include:
Waste methane emissions targeted in 36 CCAC partners’ NDCs
Lead Partner: A Coalition partner with an active role in coordinating, monitoring and guiding the work of an initiative.
Implementer: A Coalition partner or actor receiving Coalition funds to implement an activity or initiative.
Globally, landfills are the third largest anthropogenic source of methane, accounting for approximately 11% of estimated global methane emissions, or nearly 800 MtCO2e. Uncollected waste can contribute to open burning and illegal landfilling or open dumping, contributors to methane and black carbon.
The World Bank projects that municipal solid waste streams will nearly double worldwide by 2025, which not only places increasing pressure on cities to provide proper collection and management services in order to avoid open dumping and open burning, but also significantly increases the load on the environment in terms of air pollutants like methane and black carbon within a business-as-usual scenario.
More efficient collection of waste and sanitary landfills as opposed to open dumping helps keep cities cleaner and thus improves surrounding ecosystem health.
Improvement of waste management systems is one of the best ways for cities to enhance real estate values and overall local value and quality of life. While waste management will always ultimately incur economic costs for a city, as a public service that needs to be provided, appropriate waste management strategies can reduce costs from environmental damage and help improve a city’s marketability. Proper waste management can create significant job opportunities as well. A recent study published by the European Commission shows that full implementation of EU waste legislation would save €72 billion a year, increase the annual turnover of the EU waste management and recycling sector by €42 billion and create over 400,000 jobs by 2020.
Waste can also be a resource. For some cities, generating energy from waste either through landfill gas capture or incineration as a part of an integrated solid waste management plan has the potential to help offset fossil fuel derived energy sources and therefore improve resource efficiency. Additionally, compost produced from organic waste can be used as a soil amendment displacing synthetic fertilizers comprised of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium.
Food waste is addressed through one of the elements of an integrated solid waste management system through the diversion of organics. Organics management is a challenge to both developed and developing cities like New York City and Penang (Malaysia). A range of technologies exists to avoid emissions of methane from decomposition of organic waste in landfills and dumps, from processing organic waste simple windrow composting to anaerobic digestion technology. Food waste can also be addressed through prevention, for example awareness raising, and outreach and incentive programs. The Initiative will continue to feature cities like New York and Penang who have specific expertise to share with the network in order to scale up successes across the globe.
Furthermore, the Initiative has identified that a key challenge to the sustainability of organics programs that is not commonly addressed by the industry is how to create a market for the generated compost or other products. That is why the World Bank is designing a results-based incentive mechanism to increase the diversion of organic waste in Penang and is developing a learning tool to help cities from both developed or developing countries on creating sustainable markets for composting to ensure the success of their food waste and organics programs.
In the waste sector, it is important to note that reductions are guaranteed as you move up the waste hierarchy, from open dumping to waste avoidance. However, because the widely varying situations in the world – for example waste composition, climate, economic and social consequences, there is no standardized approach to easily calculate the magnitude of SLCP reduction via waste management efforts.
Although estimates can be made based on proxies, they will not be realistic or verifiable. The initiative has begun work to build a calculator to be able to quantify baseline emissions and projected emissions reductions with standardized methodology. We expect the tool to be functional by October.
Again, rapid action to reduce black carbon and methane can be achieved through banning open burning, optimizing transportation routes and upgrading equipment, diverting organics etc. However these activities cannot be implemented alone as there are considerations for economic and social challenges. That is why the initiative supports the development of tailored integrated solid waste management at the local and national levels. The initiative stresses that there are no one-size-fits-all solutions.
In the waste sector, it is important to note that reductions are guaranteed as you move up the waste hierarchy, from open dumping to waste avoidance. However, because the widely varying situations in the world – for example waste composition, climate, economic and social consequences, there is no standardized approach to easily calculate the magnitude of SLCP reduction via waste management efforts.
Although estimates can be made based on proxies, they will not be realistic or verifiable. The initiative has begun work to build a calculator to be able to quantify baseline emissions and projected emissions reductions with standardized methodology. We expect the tool to be functional by October.
Again, rapid action to reduce black carbon and methane can be achieved through banning open burning, optimizing transportation routes and upgrading equipment, diverting organics etc. However these activities cannot be implemented alone as there are considerations for economic and social challenges. That is why the initiative supports the development of tailored integrated solid waste management at the local and national levels. The initiative stresses that there are no one-size-fits-all solutions.
Stratus Consulting conducted a short study on mitigation options for short-lived climate pollutants (SLCP) mitigation from the waste sector and identified that the greatest potential to reduce black carbon comes from the transportation of and open burning of waste. Open burning is a challenge in many developing cities due to lack of landfill space and lack of awareness.
The Initiative’s work with cities will focus on moving up the waste hierarchy and developing integrated solid waste services, and one of the first steps is to gather data on open burning and identify options to mitigate this practice. Another important element in addressing black carbon is to challenge the transport system by optimizing collection routes and upgrading equipment.
As a part of an integrated approach to waste management, once an assessment has been conducted (first stage of city support), the initiative will be able to report on how many cities will address open burning and transportation of waste as key sources of black carbon.
A summary of the 'Accelrating Actions To Improve Organic Waste Management and Reduce Methane in Costa Rica' project.
On 15 February, the CCAC welcomed Dr. Oksana Tarasova, WMO, Dr. Ilse Aben, SRON, and Carolina Urmeneta, Global Methane Hub, to share knowledge on detecting waste methane emissions using satellites...
In Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) there is a tendency to eliminate waste through the final disposal technique in sanitary landfills and open-air dumps. The implementation of recovery...
CCAC Methane Roadmap Action Programme (M-RAP) supports countries to develop Methane Action Plans and implementation Roadmaps detailing their commitment to mitigate methane, and how this commitment...
CCAC Methane Roadmap Action Programme (M-RAP) supports countries to develop Methane Action Plans and implementation Roadmaps detailing their commitment to mitigate methane, and how this commitment...
Methane, a greenhouse gas with a warming potential more than 80 times higher than CO2 over a 20-year time frame, is responsible for half a degree Celsius of warming to date. Methane’s...
This report is a product of the Global Methane Assessment (GMA) that details projections of anthropogenic methane emissions through 2030 under various baseline scenarios and assesses the...